Notre Dame coach Charlie Weis has had a tough couple of years here. But rarely, if ever, has it been this bad. After Saturday’s 38-34 loss to Michigan, Weis’ detractors are out in unprecedented numbers. They want the big man out.
These boo birds are pointing to the way Weis handled the clock on what turned out to be the Irish’s final meaningful series. The basic idea is that, had Notre Dame run the ball on second and third down and forced Michigan to use their final timeouts instead of throwing two incomplete passes and stopping the clock, the Irish would have won the game.
In a word… hogwash.
To understand why Weis should not only not be criticized for this move but actually applauded, consider the following facts:
- Notre Dame’s defense had been pounded all day. By that point, Michigan, led by a true freshman quarterback in his second game, had rolled up nearly 400 yards of total offense and scored 24 offensive points.
- Michigan was having an awful time trying to stop Notre Dame’s passing game. Jimmy Clausen was firing at will into the Wolverine secondary, which was badly overmatched.
- In college football, the clock stops after each first down
- All Michigan needed was a field goal to send the game to overtime
True, Armando Allen gained 13 yards on the first play of that drive. But, at that point, Michigan figured Notre Dame was going to try to run the ball to make them call their timeouts. So they stacked the line of scrimmage and stuffed the next play. That left the following situation: second down and ten with 2:29 left and Michigan owning two timeouts. Let’s analyze the two decisions Weis could have made here:
1. He could have continued to run the ball to force Michigan to call its final timeouts. This is what all the naysayers are screaming Weis should have done. But Michigan was putting nearly everybody in the box. If you know football, you know there is almost zero chance of gaining significant yards against that type of defense, no matter how well you’ve run it all day. So chances are overwhelming that Michigan stuffs two runs, calls its final two timeouts and forces Notre Dame to punt. In that case, Michigan gets the ball back with the same amount of time it did anyway (actually, a few seconds more since running plays are quicker than passing plays). Two minutes and 15 seconds is an eternity in college football, where the clock stops after every first down. And remember, Michigan only needed a field goal to tie. Maybe they don’t score a TD, maybe they do. But are you going to tell me that 2:15 isn’t enough time for Michigan to go 45 yards to get a chip shot field goal?
2. Weis could have gotten aggressive on second and third downs, which is what he chose to do after seeing how the Michigan defense played first down. Keep in mind Michigan hadn’t stopped the pass all day long. True, Michael Floyd was out with an injury, but Notre Dame still had plenty of good receivers out there. Weis likely said to himself, “There’s only one way to guarantee we win this game — don’t give them the ball back. Clausen’s been scorching them all day. We can’t stop their offense. This game absolutely has the feel of one in which the last team that has the ball wins. Let’s complete a couple passes like we’ve been doing all day and get the heck out of here.”
Not only was this a totally acceptable football decision, it was one of which fans should be proud. In calling those pass plays, Weis did what every sports fan in America wants his team to do in any sport: play to win the game instead of not to lose it. Weis went for it. He tried to deny Michigan the one thing you need to score points — the football. He knew that was the only way to guarantee victory. Giving the Wolverines the ball back, with or without timeouts, was not something he wanted to do. And for good reason.
That’s smart, aggressive coaching. Unfortunately, smart, aggressive coaching doesn’t always result in wins. But that doesn’t make it wrong. If Clausen completes just one of those two passes, Notre Dame wins and today everybody’s talking about how Weis took the bull by the horns and won the game like a man.
Charlie Weis certainly deserves criticism for decisions he has made since he came to Notre Dame. But yesterday’s decision was not one of them.
Posted under Uncategorized
This post was written by Ed on September 13, 2009
2 Comments
